3 Ways to Break a Weight Loss Plateau

As anyone who has ever lost a lot of weight (like 20 pounds or more) will tell you, the first 5 come off easily and the last 5 are the toughest!  You’re still doing all the right things—eating less and moving more—but all of a sudden it stops working. The scale won’t budge. No matter where you are in the process, hitting a stubborn weight loss plateau is frustrating. But don’t let it erode your resolve.  Here are 3 ways to break through the plateau.

This article is also available as a podcast. Click below to listen:

Tip#1:  Calorie Cycling

In order to lose weight, you need to cut back on your calorie intake. But if you that for long enough, your body may play a nasty trick on you: It may start conserving energy by lowering your metabolic rate. The result? You don’t burn as many calories and your weight loss slows—or stops altogether. Although this feels like the worst kind of sabotage, your body is actually trying to look out for you. Your lizard brain has noticed that food supplies seem to have been scarce for an extended period of time. It’s trying to increase your chances of survival in case the famine continues. Of course, when you’re trying to lose weight, this is not very helpful.

See also: Metabolism Myths

You’re really stuck between a rock and a hard place: You could try eating even less in order to nudge off more weight, but that just confirms your lizard brain’s suspicions about the dwindling food supply. Or, you could eat more in an effort to restore a more robust metabolic rate—but that’s hardly going to help with weight loss.  There’s a way to outsmart old lizard brain: It’s called calorie cycling.

What is Calorie Cycling?

Let’s say you’ve been eating about 1800 calories a day and steadily losing weight. Now suddenly, it’s not working anymore.  Rather than trying to eat even less every day, try alternating high and low calorie days. For example, you could alternate between 2000-calorie days and 1200-calorie days. Over the course of a week, you’d trim an extra 1400 calories but the higher calorie days should help keep your lizard brain from panicking–and your willpower from flagging.

What are the Advantages of Calorie Cycling?

First of all, the higher calorie days keep your metabolism from slowing in response to sustained calorie restriction. Secondly, many people find that this sort of regimen feels easier than constant restriction. Although you may feel hungry on your low-intake day, you’ll always have a higher intake day to look forward to.

In fact, you could even try alternating higher and lower intake days without reducing the total number of calories for the week —alternating 2000-calorie days with 1600-calorie days, for example. Even without a net reduction in calories, the switch-up might be enough to knock you out of a metabolic slow-down.

Calorie Cycling is Not for Everyone

Calorie cycling clearly isn’t for everyone, and I’d encourage anyone considering it to check in with their doctor or nutrition professional first. Those with diabetes, hypoglycemia, who are pregnant, or have a history or risk of eating disorders are not good candidates for this technique.

Aside from health issues, some people may simply prefer a more traditional approach. And, honestly, as long as what you’re doing continues to work, I’d stick with that. But should you hit a plateau, calorie cycling might be something to try.

Tip #2: Mix Up Your Workouts

Although you can lose weight without exercising, exercise can help those pounds come off more quickly. However, when it comes to exercise, that darned lizard brain thwarts us once again.  If you do the same workout routine over and over again, your muscles will learn to perform those motions using less energy–and you’ll burn fewer calories. (And, by the way, the “calories burned” displays on gym cardio equipment are notoriously inaccurate!)

To maximize the benefit from your exercise sessions, you want to mix it up. Try some new classes, a different cardio machine, or even a different program on your favorite cardio equipment. (Best program for fat-burning? Interval training!) If you prefer low-tech exercise, like walking or jogging, try to find a new route that involves some extra hills, or work some 60-second sprints into your routine.

Tip 3#:  Slow Down

My final tip isn’t so much about changing the speed at which you’re losing weight as it is about reframing how you look at it. The closer you get to your goal weight, the slower the weight tends to come off. If you’re thinking of your goal weight as a finish line, this is supremely frustrating. Then again, if you lose those last pounds quickly, chances are good that they’ll come right back the minute you relax your efforts.

Rather than trying to sprint across the finish line, think of the last 5 pounds as your cool down.  By losing the last of the weight more slowly, you’re actually making a gradual transition—both mentally and physically—into your long-term maintenance phase. If it takes you 6 months to lose the final pounds, that’s 6 more months of healthy eating habits under your belt. And that greatly increases your chances of maintaining a healthy weight for the long term.

See also: The case for slower weight loss

Originally published at QuickandDirtyTips.com

A Chink in the Small, Frequent Meal Theory

For many years, we’ve been told that eating small, frequent meals is a good strategy for weight loss.   In part, this was based on a body of research showing an inverse relationship between meal frequency and BMI.   In other words, studies found that people who reported eating  more times per day were less likely to be overweight.

I’ve always been confused by this.  In my observation,  people who eat more frequently usually end up eating more calories overall–and eating more calories generally leads to higher body weight.

In a new paper in the Journal of Nutrition, Megan McCrory and colleagues explain why the research data don’t seem to line up with reality: the research data were wrong. Continue reading “A Chink in the Small, Frequent Meal Theory” >

Fat-Burning Chili Peppers: The Reality Check

This is the kind of study that the media love:  Researchers from Purdue University report that adding a half teaspoon of cayenne pepper to your meal can reduce your appetite and cause you to burn more calories.  Count on seeing this new “fat-burning tip”  popping up on magazine covers and internet aggregation sites. Before you get too excited, however, it pays to look beyond the headlines.  Continue reading “Fat-Burning Chili Peppers: The Reality Check” >

Why Make Such a Fuss About a Good Habit?

Although Mr. Harper and the editors of Shape Magazine have so far declined to comment on my challenge, the response from readers has been really fascinating.  If you’ve been following the discussion in the comment thread for yesterday’s post or on my Facebook page, then I apologize for repeating some of that here. But something that’s come up in the discussion strikes me as so significant that I really want to underline it. Continue reading “Why Make Such a Fuss About a Good Habit?” >

Dear Bob Harper and Editors of Shape Magazine

February 2011 Shape MagazineI recently came across the following weight loss advice from “Biggest Loser” trainer Bob Harper in Shape Magazine (February 2011, page 171):

“Eating first thing revs your calorie burn…If you don’t eat within two hours of waking, your metabolism can slow down to conserve energy.”

Arrggh!  What will it take to put a stake through the heart of this myth-that-will-not-die?  Bob Harper and Shape are not the first to perpetuate this urban legend and I’m sure they won’t be the last.  But, c’mon! A guy of this clout and a magazine of this caliber should do better than repeat well-worn nonsense. They should be a beacon of accuracy in the swirling fog nutrition misinformation.  And so, I’d like to issue…

A Friendly Challenge to Mr. Harper and the Editors of Shape:

If you can produce one shred of evidence or data to support this statement, I will personally treat you all to breakfast–a protein-rich and high fiber breakfast, of course. Continue reading “Dear Bob Harper and Editors of Shape Magazine” >

Ask Monica: Should I Eat More to Burn More?

Q. I started an exercise regime that says I should eat more than I normally do so that my body will burn the calories to lose the weight. The exercises are weight training and cardio and last about 45-60 min per day/ 5 days a week. Is it true that we should to eat more to burn more? I’m have been on the program for 90 days with minimal weight loss.

A.  I wish you’d written about 89 days ago because I’m afraid you’ve been given some bad information.  Simply eating more (or eating more frequently) does not cause your body to burn calories at a faster rate than it otherwise would. Continue reading “Ask Monica: Should I Eat More to Burn More?” >

Can You Eat Too Many Veggies?

A couple of readers have written this week with variations on this question.

Gwen notes that many weight loss plans allow for unlimited amounts of vegetables and wonders whether this rule is really a good one or whether some restrictions make sense.  Jim says he’s not dieting but he’s gradually increased his vegetable intake to the point that he’s now eating up to five pounds of vegetables a day.  He wonders whether that may be excessive and whether he should be concerned that almost all of the calories in vegetables come from (natural) sugars.

Obviously, you can overdo just about anything…even water.  Drink several gallons of water in a short period of time and and you can put yourself into a hyponatremic coma.  (Don’t try this at home.)

But assuming you’re not actually trying to hurt yourself,  how easy would it be to get yourself in trouble by eating too many vegetables? All in all, not that easy.  In most vegetables, the ratio of water and fiber to calories and sugar is high enough to keep you from from over-doing it.  But as you appear to be craving some guidelines, here are a few:

Continue reading “Can You Eat Too Many Veggies?” >